The debate continues
Following the last reply from Bruce Richards, I have emailed some questions of my own. And just in case you are wondering, I have forwarded this thread to all the flyline manufacturers! - Paul
Paul: You wrote...
'Actually, two objects of the same shape and density but different
weights
will not fall at exactly the same rate. Wind resistance (or water
resistance) is somewhat less for larger objects as they have less surface
area to volume.'
I find this answer confusing. By this I *think* you mean that objects of a
smaller surface area
will fall quicker due to the decreased wind resistance. Surely objects of
the same volume
and shape fall at the same velocity, no matter what the mass, as Galileo is
reputed to have
demonstrated over the side of the Leaning Tower of Pisa?
Bruce:
This is a confusing one. Most simply, if you drop two steel balls of
different diameters, the larger one will fall very slightly faster. An
interesting fact regarding spheres is that larger sperical objects have a
higher volume to surface area ratio meaning that they have slightly less
wind resistance, relatively speaking. Obviously they have a larger surface,
but relatively larger mass also,hence less wind resistance. This has little
practical application anywhere, the effect is small, but there. Objects of
the same volume and same shape definitely do not fall at the same velocity
unless they are the same mass. Envision two objects of same volume and
shape, one being a round, inflatable plastic ball, one being a steel ball
of the exact same size. Same volume, same shape, definitely won't fall at
the same rate, unless in a vacuum. I can't remember now what Galileo proved
on the Tower, but that wasn't it! Again, don't fixate on this bit of
trivia, it has little application or impact on anything related to fly
fishing.
Paul:
Anyway I have a couple of questions of my own:
In the 'perfect' cast the loop (including leader) should straighten at
exactly the same moment
as it the flyline runs out of forward momentum:
To what extent does the forward taper play in the speed of the unfurling of
the loop?
Bruce: The front taper has a big impact on the speed of the loop. Again, back to
the laws of physics. To make this simpler at first, let's assume the the
line is not being 'shot, the bottom of the loop is static. Also, let's
assume casting in a vacuum, I'll add air later. The law of conservation of
energy accounts for where energy goes.When a loop is propogated, a certain
amount of energy is contained in the moving part of the line. As the loop
moves forward, the top of the loop is moving forward, the bottom of the
loop is static. 'The law' says that the energy of the cast has to go
somewhere, in this case, as the loop proceeds forward the bottom of the
loop has essentially no energy which means the dynamic top of the loop has
it all. Barring losses from wind resistance, if the top of the loop has
more energy, but with decreasing mass, it must accelerate. Theoretically
speaking, as the top leg of the loop gets very short, its speed will
approach the speed of light. Seems incredible I know, but it is
mathematically correct. (Even with wind resistance we know the speed of the
tip of the line can be very high as the 'whip crack' sound we occasionally
hear attests. The "whip crack" means that the tip of the line has exceeded
the speed of sound which is over 700 mph. In the presence of air the speed
of the tip of the line cannot approach the
speed of light as the 'excess' energy packed into the loops top leg is
sapped through friction with the air. Now, about the taper. As the top leg
gets shorter it gets lighter which causes the acceleration. If the line is
tapered also it gets lighter even faster as it gets shorter. Long tapers
facilitate more rapid, earlier acceleration and, hence, energy dissipation
through high wind resistance. Short tapers conserve the energy longer
causing a harder, faster turn over right at the end. Large tip diameters
(mass) also keep the mass from reducing as quickly, again resulting in a
later, harder turnover.
I know this may seem a little hard to believe, but check with a physicist,
I have, it is correct.
Paul:
What is the correlation between the unfurling of the loop, the lack of
friction of the
running line through the rings and the velocity of the forward travel?
Bruce: When shooting, the lower the resistance of the bottom leg of the loop (I
include the line in the rod and on the ground waiting to shoot) the more
slowly the loop will turn over. You can demonstrate this easily yourself.
Make a long cast and shoot a bunch of line. Make the same cast again but
grab the line and stop the shoot when the line a ways out. The loop will
quickly turn over just when you grab the line and stop it. As soon as you
stop the shoot all the energy of the cast is forced into the top leg which
causes a rapid acceleration.
Paul:
Is it possible to design a flyline which unfurls slowly and yet shoots
quickly?
Bruce: Yes, take a cue from tournament distance casters. For the longest casts
they use a shooting head about 55 ft. long and very fine monofilament as a
shooting line. The loop doesn't exactly unfurl slowly, but because the head
is long and there is very little resistance from the shooting line it takes
quite a while for the loop to completely unroll. The real key is the small
diameter shooting line, it offers little resistance to the bottom leg which
allows the loop to open at the slowest possible rate, which is critical to
deliver a fly at long range.
Paul: And lastly, the Scandinavians who cast for Loop are talking about the running line
on some shooting heads being too thin, and 'overtaking' the loop. Frankly I
can't
see how this is possible as it is the forward momentum of the flyline which
pulls out the running line. Surely what is happening here is that there
isn't
sufficient friction in the running line to make the loop unfurl?
Bruce: I think there is always enough friction, besides the loop forms when the
rod tip stops. The top leg pulls the bottom leg along, the bottom leg
cannot overtake the top. If a loop isn't turning over properly a skilled
caster will manually add some friction to the bottom leg to force it to
turn over.
Many many thanks to Bruce for giving his time to this subject - Paul
Back to Peter Suttons comments
|